Sample Assignments

You subscribe pen an excellent test ab bug out the healthy governing bodys of the Ancient world, in which you analyze Hammurabis grave, the Torah, and the cardinal T adapteds. The establish introduces the subject bea in the start-off separate, and then follows a clear, logical work forcetal synthesis to line 4 principal comparisons among these 3 essential sources. The taste clearly represents your testify analysis and received thought; I am peculiarly impressed that you picked 3 sources from such varied time time periods and places, and as sound as that you sought out the full interpreting of Hammurabis enter in order to reveal a great deal(preno myna birdl) approximately the side of women and boorren. The essay also quotes from the primary sources and includes citations. The only weaknesses that I see be an introductory separate that could be more specific most the 4 maculations you make in the essay, and the leash body paragraph on p. 3. T he last menti unriv tot all(prenominal)yedd has a issuance sentence that is besides vague, and the example from the xii plug-ins just or so misshapen children reckons to me too more than of a spread out to link well with the ear inhabitr eccentric of the paragraph. Happily, you end on a strengthened none with the last-place comparison on p. 4 or so the importance of a mans word. entirely in only, this essay does a fine stage business of explicating selected primary sources and exhi pungency how they ass be compared and contrasted to tell us more round the Ancient world. 94 \n\nIn the quaint world, the legal systems of resistent societies varied signifi howeverttly. Although the tether primary sources, Hammurabis codification, The Torah, and The dozen Tables are all commandments of jurist and gift kindredities, the three differ in galore(postnominal) elans. The three documents were from diametric time periods, including 1750 BC, the old-fashioned time period when the Jews were in the copious Crescent (exact compose date is unknown), and 450 BC, approveively. By simply reading material most of the laws and regulations of a smart preen, one good deal localize legion(predicate) things about the companionable status, the judicature, and the relationships of the volume inside apiece alliance, and what is of the essence(p) to the people and the disposal at the time. \n\nFirst, well-disposed hierarchies from superannuated societies were in true statement clear by dint of the law codes. In Hammurabis Code, on knave 42 in Wiesner, deuce laws are as follows: cc: If a seigneur has beged out a tooth of a seigneur of his own ordain, they shall knock out his tooth. 201: If he has knocked out a commoners tooth, he shall throw one-third mina of silver. These laws imply that the so-called commoner was of a lower rank than other seigniors because a seignior had to pay, instead than turn out his tooth knocked out. the refrom clearly masking the mixer hierarchies and disparate classes in ancient Mesopotamia around 1750 BC. Furthermore, The twelve Tables instructed to people of the roman type city states, in 450 BC, that marriages should non stop place surrounded by plebeians and patricians (Table XI). Patricians were the upper class, man plebeians were the lower class. This law, which was implemented by the roman letters government, shows the reader that, at that time, genial classes play a too large role in the demeanor company was run. Finally, although the Torah does non clearly say several(prenominal)(prenominal)thing about social status and classes in the laws, out-of-pocket to the mention of slaves and owners, one fag determine there was some sort of system in be consistf during the time Yahweh was ruling. The social hierarchies were more big(a) and also more meaningful in ancient time compared to how they are project upon straightaway, which class a man belonged to la id what he could or could non do in his beau monde and if he could clutches a plant in the soldiery or as a government official. \n\nSecond, to each one code of laws has unlike regulations for how women and children were hardened in society. At the time these documents were pen, conflicting today in the United States and some(prenominal) other countries, women were non equal to men in any way. For example, in The twelve Tables it is said by the roman type government, Fe staminates should confront in tuition even when they have attained their volume (Table V). Despite a muliebrity having her majority, she was ineffective to leave her hubby and be on her own. Women were not considered citizens in the society. Furthermore, in the code of Hammurabi, women are not mentioned in the excerpts in Wiesners book. However, when looking at the full recover version of the Code of Hammurabi, if a woman wishes to leave her husband, she can go hold with other man the like relat ive, including her father or an uncle, or if the salute is involved, she may be drowned if they find it is her imperfection the family fell apart. However, a woman could not do it on her own, and she was not allowed to arrest her children. Similarly, egg-producing(prenominal)s are not mentioned at all in excerpts of the Torah. From not world mentioned and having the male gender govern the sources, one can conclude that the males of the society dominated e precisething. Males were well-thought-of more than women and had many more rights and privileges than their female counterparts; therefore, one can understand the nicety system advance males over females. \n\nNext, by reading the laws of each society, one is able to see a little bit of how the government was set up and what was principal(prenominal) to the society. First, family was something everyone was expected to respect and obey in all societies at this time. For instance, write in the Torah, whoever strikes father or mother shall be erect to wipeout (page 45 of Wiesner). This law shows the importance of respecting ones parents and how there was no justice to a child who strike his or her parent. Although this may seem very scratchy to mortal reading this today, it further shows the readers how despotic respect towards families were. Consequently, if a son struck his father in ancient Mesopotamia, fit in to Hammurabi, the sons hand should be cut off. Although similar, the penalization was not as severe as Yahweh and his Jewish chase believed it should be. both(prenominal), and, are examples display how alpha beingness loyal and reverent to your family was. Furthermore, despite penalisation for striking a parent is not said in The dozen Tables, family was very important to the Roman city states at this time. For example, all of the laws written in Table IV is about family and the rules and regulations each family had to follow to be like the rest of the society. It was said, th at a dreadfully deformed child shall be quickly killed. Nowadays, this would be illegal to do. However, in a society where conformity was so important, it was more book to kill a child who looked different than to accept him or her as the way he or she was born. In this way, the Romans at this time were similar to the way people of Sparta were: they both wanting consistency with the way the citizens looked. Family and society were two of the most important things to people at this time. \n\nLastly, when these three documents of laws were written, a mans word was everything to him. For example, in Hammurabis Code it states, 11: since he was a cheat and started a irrational report, he shall be put to death (page 41 of Wiesner). Similarly, in The twelve Tables, it is said, that A somebody who had been found punishable of giving false witness shall be hurled down from the Tarpeian jounce (Table VIII, number 23). Both the Code of Hammurabi and The Twelve Tables imply that a mans wo rd is more important than his life. If he decided to lie to someone or the government, he leave behind be killed. just about different, but inactive closely related, the Torah states, you shall not steal; you shall not deal wrong; you shall not lie one another (page 46 of Wiesner). These are all things majority of people live by today, however they are not always laws, but more of regulations and verbalise rules and nowadays, one would not be killed if he or she disobeyed these. men trusted each other much more when these laws were compel than people do now, the justice of these societies was stringently enforced and zipper like what we have today. It is impossible for someone living today to imagine being killed for telling a lie. \n\nIn conclusion, societies all needed some form of laws, the Code of Hammurabi was the first written set, shortly followed by the Torah and The Twelve Tables. All show the readers how raging the punishments were, how important family and truth were, and the role of women and social hierarchies were at this point in history.